대가들의 한마디2013. 8. 21. 00:30
반응형

Warren Buffett: No Regrets From Crisis Weekend nulle Year Ago
워렌 버핏: 일년 전 그 날의 선택에 후회는 없다. 




워렌 버핏은 CNBC와의 인터뷰에서, 금융 위기가 정점에 달했던 일년 전의 2008년 9월 같은 주에 자신이 내린 그 어떤 결정에 대해서도 후회가 없다고 이야기했다.

오늘 저녁 방영 될 Squawk Box 의 베키 퀵과의 녹화 인터뷰에서, 그는 일년 전 금요일 밤 200 에서 250억 달러 규모의 AIG社의 손해 보험 (property casualty) OP (operation) 를 인수해달라는 전화 청탁을 "진중히 검토했었다(looked hard at)"고 하면서, 그러나 이를 거절하기로 마음먹었다고 밝혔다. 

워렌은 그날 저녁 AIG의 CEO 였던 Bob Willumstad 에게,
"안됐지만, 난 이 거래 못하겠소. 나한테 시간 낭비하지 말아요. 그러니, 다른데 가서 알아보도록 해요" 라고 말했다며 당시 상황을 회상했다.

그는 또 당시를 떠올리며, 토요일 저녁엔 바클리가 리먼의 구제에 나서도록 영국 정부를 설득할 수 있었을 복잡한 재보험 건에 대해 바클리 캐피탈의 Bob Diamond 로부터 전화를 받았다고 이야기했다. 

에드몬튼 (캐나다) 에서의 사교 모임에 막 참석하려던 때, 퍼핏은 그 건에 대한 세부사항이 적힌 팩스를 요구했다고 한다.
하지만, 그가 자정쯤 자신의 호텔에 돌아왔을 때 팩스는 도착하지 않았고 그 계획이 실패한 것으로 여겼다고.

오늘 캘리포니아에서 있었던 포츈지의 <가장 강력한 여성 지도자> 모임에서 이 잡지사의 Carol Loomis와 함께 출연한 그는, 신제품에 관심이 많던 딸의 도움으로 그로부터 10개월 정도 지나 자신의 휴대폰 속에서 Diamond 의 것을 포함해 그 주 (1년전)에 받았던 수 많은 보이스 메시지들을 발견했다고 털어놓았다. 



당시 버핏의 자신의 휴대폰에 대한 무지가 리먼을 파국으로 몰았던 것일까?
그렇진 않을 것이다.
그날 저녁은 수 많은 일들이 벌어지고 있었고, 모든것이 잘못되어 돌아가던 시점에 단지 전화 한 통화가 이 모든 것을 정상으로 돌렸으리라고는 생각되지 않는다.

다음은 버핏과 베키의 인터뷰 중 파트 1의 비디오 클립과 대화내용이다. 
(파트 2는 내일 오전 CNBC의 Squawk Box 에서 6시에 방영된다)

그녀는 워렌에게, 다른 금융 시스템들을 살리기 위해 리먼은 파산했어야만 했다라는 일부의 주장에 동의하느냐는 질문으로 인터뷰를 시작했다.

* 인터뷰의 트랜스크립트 
http://www.cnbc.com/id/32867249

 

 

BECKY QUICK: So the --

BUFFETT:  We'll --

BECKY:  -- more important --

BUFFETT:  -- we're --

BECKY:  -- one to save?

BUFFETT:  Lehman -- Lehman probably should have been -- not saved isn't the right world -- word, but transferred in some kind of an orderly manner.  I mean it was -- it was the chaos that came after the fact that it just -- it just happened and there was total disorder.  And I think the trustee for Lehman has said between $50 and $75 billion at Lehman itself was lost unnecessarily because of the disorderly way that the liquidation took place.

BECKY: Obviously there were a lot of calls that were going on behind the scenes at that point.  Were you a part of any of those calls?

BUFFETT: Oh, I -- I got a call.  I was in Edmonton -- at a social event that -- I was at the hotel about 6:00 or so Edmonton time.  And I did get a call from -- from -- the head of -- the head of Barclay's -- Bob Diamond and -- and Michael Klein, who was an investment banker.  And they had just learned apparently that the British authorities would not allow them to take over all of Lehman.  This was not just the part that they took over later.  But they were -- they were talking about -- about coming in and taking over Lehman.  And the British authorities had said if -- if it involved more than three billion pounds, as I remember, it needed the vote of shareholders and that couldn't take place 'til sometime later so they were asking if we would write an insurance contract that would protect everybody on the other side of trades until they got that shareholder approval.  So they were looking for a solution I can tell you at about 8:00 on —

BECKY: On Saturday?

BUFFETT:  -- on Saturday.  And -- 8:00 in the evening.  And -- they didn't find one.

BECKY:  Were you surprised?  I mean it -- what happened?  Did you turn down this offer?  What happened?

BUFFETT:  Well, what happened is they described the transaction to me that I really couldn't grasp -- quickly.  And so I asked them to send me a fax at the hotel.  I was gonna go to the social affair that would break up around midnight.  Send me a fax that explains the transaction in detail so I could understand it.  Tell me how much of a limit they needed and -- how much of a premium they would pay.  And then I would get back to them promptly.  I'd call 'em that night.  And -- 'cause it was a complicated transaction they were describing.  I didn' t -- I didn't fully understand it and people were waiting for me downstairs.  (CHUCKLES)  Anyway -- when I got back to the hotel that night around midnight, but there was no fax.  Apparently it blew up at some point in that period.

BECKY:  What -- what did you hear afterwards?  That -- did they explain to you why or what?

BUFFETT:  Well, I -- no, I -- I don't know why they felt the transaction was unfeasible or I don't know if for some other reason that Barclay's decided they couldn't go ahead with Lehman at that point.  And as you know, a few days later they actually made a transaction with the broker-dealer arrangement.  But -- the way I understood it on Saturday at 8:00 New York time or so was that -- that -- one of the authorities in -- in England had ruled essentially that if it involved more than, I think, three billion pounds that they couldn't do it without shareholder approval.

BECKY:  Did you get other phone calls that weekend?

BUFFETT:  I (LAUGHS) got a lot of phone calls.  I had a phone call on Friday night -- the Friday -- late Friday afternoon -- on AIG.  And they -- they were gonna need many, many billions of dollars by the following Wednesday, so I went down to the office on Friday night and looked hard at whether we might possibly buy a very large property casualty operation from them.  And -- spent a few hours then.  And then I called (AIG CEO) Bob Willumstad and I said, "Unfortunately -- I can't do this deal.  And don't waste your time with me, so go someplace else."  Then on Sunday after I got back from Edmonton, AIG was in the picture again and they were looking for an insurance policy in connection with an offer that was being made for AIG.  I think it was by Chris Flowers and perhaps KKR, a few people.

BECKY:  Right.

BUFFETT:  A few people.  And they said they were gonna get goin' to a board meeting and decide whether they were going to accept this.  But if they did accept it would we be good on a certain type of reinsurance transaction.  I said I thought we would.  But then that blew up on Sunday night, so it was -- a lot of action.

BECKY:  Is this different than any time you'd ever experienced before?

BUFFETT:  It was --

BECKY:  That were --

BUFFETT:  -- it was -- except for the Solomon experience I had in 1991, when I was more directly involved.  This was a very extraordinary weekend.

BECKY: What did you see in the AIG deal, in the offer there that you -- that you thought, "Forget about it.  This is not gonna work?"

BUFFETT:  I just -- we were talking about buying a property casualty operation that might have sold in the $25 billion range.  And what I saw indicated to me I wouldn't have wanted to pay that in the first place.  And beyond that it would have required New York State Insurance Department approval and who knows was else.  And I just -- there was no way to hand a lot of money by Wednesday the next -- the next week.

BECKY:  And in hindsight do you have any regrets about any of the decisions you made that weekend?

BUFFETT:  No.  I -- I mean the -- the -- I should have been probably doing other things too.  No, I -- I'm -- I am -- I am glad we didn't buy that particular insurance operation.  I would have done the reinsurance transaction that was involved on Sunday night.  The Lehman thing I still don't understand, even (CHUCKLES) to this day, exactly what the transaction was.  No, it was -- it was -- it was a movie to see but not to -- participate in.  (LAUGHS)

PART TWO: NO "BOUNCE" FOR ECONOMY, BUT RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE HAS IMPROVED

BECKY:  Who do you think the biggest heroes (of the financial crisis) are?

BUFFETT:  Well, I think the heroes are-- are-- (Federal Reserve Chairman) Bernanke.  I think (former Treasury Secretary) Paulson's a hero.  I think (Treasury Secretary) Geithner’s a hero are-- I-- I-- you know, you can look back and say you could have done this a little differently or that a little differently, but at the time I called it an economic Pearl Harbor and in the end we got through Pearl Harbor.  And-- and it could have turned out a lot differently.

BECKY:  There are some people, including (bank analyst) Meredith Whitney, who say-- we've just kicked things down the road. That the banks-- are-- are still struggling.  That we have a lot of problems that could still come up from credit cards, from other areas, from consumers getting pinched for-- needing credit.  Are we through the worst of it?  And--

BUFFETT:  Oh, I think we're certainly—we’re through the worst of it in residential real estate in all probability.  And-- and-- and the reason is we're building a lot fewer houses and we're-- and we're forming households, so that solves itself over time.  Doesn't do it in a day or a week, but it solves itself.  So we're further on that.  We're gonna have unusual losses in credit cards and in commercial real estate, all of that.  But we're a lot better off than we were a year ago.  I mean for one thing on some of the-- some of the toxic assets have been flushed through.  There's been capital raised.  There’s -- we're immeasurably better than we were-- off than we were a year ago.

BECKY:  But is there a risk of a second downturn?  Will unemployment levels climb to a point where it becomes a leading indicator rather than a lagging indicator?

BUFFETT:  I-- I think the odds are very much against getting significantly worse.  It's sort of plateaued at the-- at the bottom right now, but if you got some horrible exogenous event, some-- some, you know, 9/11-- type event or worse-- you know, you could have something that would be dis-- really disruptive and start things all over again.  But in terms of problems that we've identified and are working with, we've got more to come.  But we're-- we're-- we're past the-- we're past the critical point.

BECKY:  What are the most important economic indicators that you watch?  Is there a series of numbers?  Are there-- some statistics that you look at most closely?

BUFFETT:  Well, I look at our businesses every day.  But I-- I look at everything.  I mean I-- I-- I look at car loadings.  I look at the Fed's balance sheet.  Whatever it may be.  I mean I-- and-- and we have not bounced-- but we've quit going down.  I'm and-- and it—the world will come back.  I've never been able to tell whether it's gonna be a week or a month or-- six months.  But we are on the mend.  And-- and if you look at-- at housing prices and activity in the mid to lower price range, it changed dramatically from a year ago.  We're seeing some stability.

BECKY:  All right.  Let me go at this another way.  Let's pretend you're on a desert island for a month.  There's only one set of numbers you can get.  What would it be?

BUFFETT:  Well, I would probably look at-- perhaps freight car loadings and-- perhaps-- and-- and truck tonnage moved and-- but I’d want to look at a lot of figures.  (LAUGHTER)

BECKY:  You are the biggest shareholder-- Berkshire Hathaway is the biggest shareholder in Kraft. [KFT  26.27    0.19  (+0.73%)   ]   Is the Kraft bid to go after Cadbury [CSG  0.64    0.02  (+3.23%)   ] a good one?

BUFFETT:  Well, it's a pretty full one.  I mean-- the-- Kraft-- Kraft has got-- anytime you're in a takeover, you know, that-- the animal spirits run high and all of that.  But Kraft has the disadvantage of using an undervalued stock.  So if you-- if part of your currency is a stock that's worth more money than it's selling for and you're-- you're paying full negotiated value for the other guy’s property and you wouldn't sell your own property for anything like the market price, it's-- it's a-- it makes it a tough game.  So it's-- it's a full price.

BECKY:  Are-- that makes it sound like as if you're not in favor of this bid?

BUFFETT:  No, I-- I've got a lot of confidence in (Kraft CEO) Irene Rosenfeld.  She'll-- but they have to do a lot of things right to justify this price.

BECKY:  What do you think about the-- the talk towards health care and where things are headed right now?

BUFFETT:  Well, I think that-- unfortunately, I think that the -- what-- what-- we're really talking about reforming health insurance more than health care.  So I-- the incentives that produce the 16 or so percent of GDP that's going to health care, I think unfortunately they're getting-- they're going to get changed.  But-- so I think that we really-- and I'm talking as much about reforming health care as we're talking about reforming the insurance.  And I think that will be an opportunity missed if we don't do more about looking at what-- what the incentives are in the present system and what they would be in an ideal system.

BECKY:  And then finally, if-- if you had to-- give a gauge of where you stand on the economy again right now-- versus what you were thinking three months ago, is it the same?  Is it better?

BUFFETT:  It-- it hasn't gotten worse.  It hasn't gotten much better either.  But the very fact that time is passing, it's-- it's gotten better in residential real estate.  That’s important.  Certain things haven't hit much yet.  Commercial real estate, for example.  But we are moving through a recession.  And-- and-- and I see nothing that makes me worry about the fact that it's going to be worse than I would have thought three months ago.

Current Berkshire stock price

반응형
Posted by 스탠스
반응형

2008년 자산 증식 폭발의 해

2009년 전문가 소양 개발,사업기반의 확립의 해,자산 관리의 해

2010년 열정에 대한 가시적 효과의 해,다양성의 참여의 해

2011년 전문가의 대담과 실제적 경험을 통한 공부의 해

2012년 기본(基本)의 실천을 통한 사회진출 성공의 해

2013년 살아있는 공부와 끓임없는 투자철학의 준수의 해

2014년 불혹의 노력과 신뢰를 통한 파트너 형성의 증식의 해

2015년 제도권, 메이저 회사와의 경쟁적 파트너 쉽 계약의 해

2016년 창조적 파괴와 기존의 투자 패러다임의 재성찰의 해

2017년 끓임없는 자기평가와 人으로서의 나눔과 사랑의 실천의 해

2018년 모멘텀 벨류의 선두 주자, 금융투자,외환투기의 정점의 해

2019년 사회적 약자를 돕는 기초적 기반성형의 해

2020년 지속 불가능한 소비형 재단 설립과 기존 투자철학을 통한

          수익의 사회 환원의 해

2021년 부의 양이 아닌 나눔의 질의 가치 투자의 해

2022년 George Soros,Buffett 에 이은 투자철학의 설파의 해

2023년 선수에서 코치로의 전환,재정교육 재단 설립의 해

2024년 도제 방식의 재정교육을 통한 교정적 정의 실천의 해

....

2050년 종교와 국가를 넘어선 나눔. 새로운 패러다임의 배움의 해


나는 이것을 지키고 있는가?? 스스로 반성해보자

반응형
Posted by 스탠스